Ex Parte Chen et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-0563                                                        
          Application 09/941,537                                                      

               forming an antireflectance coating (ARC) layer over the IMD            
          layer such that the ARC layer is formed over sidewalls of the at            
          least one via opening without filling the at least one via openings;        
          and                                                                         
               depositing a photoresist layer over the IMD layer and                  
          photolithographically patterning a trench opening over the at least         
          one via opening.                                                            
               The examiner relies upon the following references as evidence          
          of obviousness:                                                             
          Filipiak et al. (Pilipiak)         5,918,147      Jun. 29, 1999             
          Yu et al. (Yu)                     6,027,861      Feb. 22, 2000             
          Lin et al. (Lin)                   6,042,999      Mar. 28, 2000             
               Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to a method for              
          reducing light reflectance from the sidewalls of a via in a                 
          photolithographic trench patterning dual damascene process.  The            
          method entails, inter alia, forming an antireflectance coating (ARC)        
          layer over the inter-metal dielectric (IMD) layer in a manner such          
          that the ARC layer is formed over the sidewalls of the via opening          
          but without filling the via opening.                                        
               Appealed claims 1-3, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13-15 and 17-24 stand               
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lin in         
          view of Yu and Filipiak.                                                    
               The claims of the groups set forth at pages 8 and 9 of                 
          appellants’ brief stand or fall together.                                   

                                            2                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007