Ex Parte Tateishi et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-0571                                                        
          Application No. 09/951,407                                                  

               (3) optionally a second layer, other than said toner image-            
          receiving layer, located on the same side of said support as said           
          toner image-receiving layer,                                                
               wherein organic particles selected from the group consisting           
          of particles of starch, cellulose esters, cellulose ethers and              
          synthetic resins, and having a glass transition temperature or              
          melting point not higher than a fixing temperature at which an              
          image is fixed on said toner image-receiving layer, are dispersed           
          in the thermoplastic resin of said toner image-receiving layer or           
          are dispersed in said second layer.                                         
               In the rejection of the appealed claims, the examiner relies           
          upon the following references:                                              
          Taguchi et al. (Taguchi)       5,843,628            Dec.  1, 1998           
          Aylward et al. (Aylward)       6,232,056 B1         May  15, 2001           
          Mohri et al. (Mohri)           6,233,424 B1         May  15, 2001           
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to an image-                 
          receiving material for electrophotography comprising a toner                
          image-receiving layer containing the recited organic particles              
          dispersed in a thermoplastic resin of the image-receiving layer.            
               Appealed claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 21 stand rejected under              
          35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Mohri.  Claims 9 and             
          10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable            
          over Mohri.  Also, claims 2, 3 and 12 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Mohri in view of              
          Aylward, whereas claims 2, 3, 11 and 22 stand rejected under                



                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007