Ex Parte Nanni et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered                            
                 today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board             
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                             _______________                                                 
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                             _______________                                                 
                                   Ex parte MARCO NAHMIAS NANNI and                                          
                                             ANTONIO SERRA                                                   
                                      Appeal No. 2006-0574                                                   
                                          Application 09/878,405                                             
                                             _______________                                                 
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                    
                                             _______________                                                 
            Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                        
            WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of            
            claims 55 through 60 and 62 through 107, which are the only claims pending in this               
            application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                  
                   According to appellants, the invention is directed to processes for producing tires       
            for vehicle wheels (e.g., claim 55), processes for preparing an elastomeric composition          
            (e.g., claims 62, 93, and 102), crosslinked manufactured products (e.g., claim 103), and         
            tires for vehicle wheels (e.g., claim 107), where the process for producing tires includes       
            a crosslinking step carried out essentially without the need for additional crosslinking         






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007