Ex Parte Carpenter et al - Page 2



                 Appeal No. 2006-0595                                                                                                              
                 Application No. 09/932,860                                                                                                        

                 or atomic layer deposition (ALD), where the chamber includes a                                                                    
                 chamber body, a chamber lid, a chamber cavity, a vapor delivery                                                                   
                 head, with a gas delivery path traveling through the chamber body                                                                 
                 via a feedthrough device (Brief, page 3).   A heating device           1                                                          
                 which includes at least one resistor element having at least a                                                                    
                 portion thereof disposed within a thermally conductive sheathing                                                                  
                 is associated with the feedthrough device, a layer of thermal                                                                     
                 insulation is disposed between at least a portion of the                                                                          
                 sheathing and the chamber body, and a temperature sensing device                                                                  
                 is disposed between the layer of insulation and the longitudinal                                                                  
                 body portion of the feedthrough device (Brief, pages 3-4).  A                                                                     
                 copy of representative independent claim 1 may be found in                                                                        
                 Appendix A attached to appellants’ Brief.                                                                                         
                         The examiner has relied upon the following references as                                                                  
                 evidence of obviousness:                                                                                                          
                 Whitney                        4,638,150            Jan. 20, 1987                                                                 
                 Fukuda et al. (Fukuda)         5,496,410            Mar. 05, 1996                                                                 
                 Sajoto et al. (Sajoto)         6,056,823            May  02, 2000                                                                 
                         The claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                                                              
                 as unpatentable over Sajoto in view of Whitney and Fukuda (Office                                                                 
                 action dated Jan. 10, 2005, page 5; Brief, page 4, paragraph 6;                                                                   

                         1We refer to and cite from the Supplemental Brief dated                                                                   
                 April 13, 2005.                                                                                                                   
                                                                        2                                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007