Ex Parte Willems - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2006-0679                                                                      Page 2                 
              Application No. 09/997,934                                                                                       


                                                      BACKGROUND                                                               
                      The appellant's invention relates to a sprung surface handle pivotably mounted                           
              on a base plate, the base plate provided with a raised handle-protecting part, or parts,                         
              between an edge or edges of the plate and an arm or arms of the handle to protect the                            
              handle from engagement with other objects (see present specification, page 1).  A copy                           
              of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                                


                                                     Applied Prior Art                                                         
              Koll     2,715,243    Aug. 16, 1955                                                                              
              Willems    5,797,635    Aug. 25, 1998                                                                            

                                                       The Rejection                                                           
                      Claims 1-12 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                            
              over Koll in view of Willems.                                                                                    
                      Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                            
              the appellant regarding this appeal, we make reference to the examiner's answer for the                          
              examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection and to the appellant's brief                           
              (filed January 15, 2004) for the appellant's arguments thereagainst.                                             













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007