The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte PAUL ARTEMI
_______________
Appeal No. 2006-0736
Application 90/006,286
_______________
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
_______________
Before FLEMING, Chief Administrative Judge, HARKCOM, Vice Chief
Administrative Judge, and GAUDETTE, Administrative
Patent Judges.
Per curiam.
Claims 1-7 of Patent No. 5,584,455 are presently subject to
reexamination. The examiner has confirmed the patentability of
claims 2, 5 and 7. Claims 1, 3, 4 and 6 stand rejected and are
the subject of the present appeal. A hearing in this appeal was
scheduled for April 6, 2006.
On April 4, 2006, applicant filed a paper entitled “REQUEST
TO WITHDRAW APPEAL," requesting that this appeal be withdrawn and
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007