Ex Parte 6130614 et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2006-0743                                                                             2                
               Reexamination Control No. 90/006,690                                                                              

                      Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal:                                                 
                      1.  A detection system for use within a vehicle of the type having a trunk which is                        
               selectively movable between an open and a closed position, said detection system being adapted                    
               to detect the presence of a breathing individual within said trunk, said detection system                         
               comprising:                                                                                                       
                      a breathing detector which is disposed within said trunk, which is adapted to detect the                   
               breathing of said individual, and which generates a first signal upon the detection of said                       
               breathing;                                                                                                        
                      an illuminated touch sensitive pad which is disposed within said trunk, and which                          
               generates a second signal upon being touched; and                                                                 
                      a controller assembly which is communicatively coupled to said illuminated touch                           
               sensitive pad and said breathing detector, which receives said signal, and which opens said trunk                 
               upon receipt of one or more of said signal.                                                                       
                                             References relied on by the examiner                                                
               Federspiel     5,464,369    Nov. 7, 1995                                                                          
               Simon      5,856,646    Jan. 5, 1999                                                                              
               Gager et al. (Gager)    6,222,442    Apr. 24, 20012                                                               
               Marrazzo et al. (Marrazzo)   6,349,984    Feb. 26, 20023                                                          
                                                     Rejections on appeal                                                        
               (1) Claims 1-4, 7, 8, 10-20, 22 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                             
                                                                                                                                
                      2  The application which matured into U.S. Patent No. 6,222,442 was filed on March 29,                     
               1999.  Therefore, U.S. Patent No. 6,222,442 is prior art to U.S. Patent No. 6,130,614 under                       
               35 U.S.C. § 102(e).                                                                                               
                      3  The application which matured into U.S. Patent No. 6,349,984 was filed on April 5,                      
               1999.  Therefore, U.S. Patent No. 6,349,984 is prior art to U.S. Patent No. 6,130,614 under                       














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007