Ex Parte Kustov et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2006-0753                                                        
          Application No. 09/682,010                                                  


                                PRIOR ART REFERENCE                                   
               The sole prior art reference relied upon by the examiner is:           
          Monque et al. (Monque)        5,576,256           Nov. 19, 1996             
                                                  (Filed May 23, 1994)                
                                      REJECTION                                       
               Claims 1 through 5 and 14 through 16 stand rejected under              
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the disclosure of Monque.           

                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully reviewed the claims, specification and               
          applied prior art, including all of the arguments and the                   
          evidence advanced by the examiner and the appellants in support             
          of their respective positions.  This review has led us to con-              
          clude the examiner’s § 103 rejection is well founded.  Accord-              
          ingly, we affirm the examiner’s § 103 rejection for essentially             
          the findings of fact set forth in the Answer.  We add the                   
          following for emphasis and completeness.                                    
               The examiner finds (Answer, pages 3 and 4) and the                     
          appellants do not dispute (Brief and Reply Brief in their                   
          entirety) that:                                                             

                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007