Ex Parte Rasmussen et al - Page 12



          Appeal No. 2006-0780                                                        
          Application No. 10/331,716                                                  

               As a final point we note that the Appellants have not                  
          directed us to evidence of secondary considerations in support              
          of their arguments against the Examiner’s rejections.                       
                                     CONCLUSION                                       
          The rejection of claims 1-15, 48 and 49 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,              
          first paragraph is reversed.  The rejection of claim 49 under               
          35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph is affirmed.  We affirm all               
          of the stated prior art rejections.                                         

















                                         12                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007