Ex Parte WILSON et al - Page 11



          Appeal No. 2006-0812                                                          
          Application No. 09/391,294                                                    
          8, lines 20-22).  This is based on the appellants’ argument that              
          the flange of Hauck, while extending beyond the member, does not              
          extend from the member as it is simply adjacent to the member.                
          The appellants urge that the flange is made of metal while the                
          corner is made of wood, two different materials which cannot be “a            
          single member”  (Appeal Brief, page 9, lines 4-5).                            
               Hauck illustrates a composite building corner member with a              
          metal flange and a corner wooden post.                                        
               Hauck Figure 1 reflects a metal corner piece covering the                
          building sheathing in conjunction with a wooden corner piece.                 
               Hauck Figure 12 is reproduced below:                                     









                                                                                       
               As may be seen, the Hauck metal flanges 8 and wood portion 6,            
          when taken together, form each of the first portion and the second            
          portion as claimed in claims 1 and 5.  As discussed above, we                 
                                                                                       
          2 Figure 1 of Hauck shows a wooden corner post with an internal metal flange  
                                          11                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007