Ex Parte Rouns et al - Page 4


               Appeal No. 2006-0817                                                                                                  
               Application 10/325,443                                                                                                

               formed on the “monomer” modified polymeric surface in order to form any manner of                                     
               “lubricious coating.”  Thus, the coating must be polymeric and have the property of being                             
               “lubricious” to any extent, however small, in which “lubricious” has its common, ordinary                             
               meaning in the context of the disclosure in the written description in the specification of having                    
               the property of being slippery or smooth.1                                                                            
                       The plain language of dependent claim 2 requires that the polymer reacting with the                           
               monomer to form the lubricious coating “is a hydrogel polymer,” wherein the hydrogel polymer                          
               can be polymerized on the surface, such as from quaternary amine acrylate monomers, as                                
               specified in dependent claim 1.  The resulting hydrogel quaternary amine acrylate polymer, as                         
               specified in independent claim 18, can have more than 50,000 repeating units, as specified in                         
               dependent claim 12 and independent claim 27.                                                                          
                       We agree with appellants that the Michal references “have substantially identical                             
               disclosures, except for the claims” (brief, page 2), and accordingly, we consider only Michal                         
               ‘285, applicable to the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), as indeed, the examiner does                        
               not distinguish between the references.  See In re Jones, 958 F.2d 347, 349, 21 USPQ2d 1941,                          
               1942 (Fed. Cir. 1992); In re Kronig, 539 F.2d 1300, 1302-04, 190 USPQ 425, 426-28 (CCPA                               
               1976).                                                                                                                
                       We find that Michal ‘285 would have disclosed to one of ordinary skill in this art a                          
               lubricious, hydrophilic coating composition comprising, among others, a grafting component and                        
               a hydrophilic polymer, but not a binding component (e.g., col. 4, ll. 66-67, col. 5, ll. 9-14 and                     
               48-51, and col. 17, Example 5).  The grafting component adheres or grafts to the polymeric                            
               surface of the medical device and crosslinks to the hydrophilic polymer to form the lubricious,                       
               hydrophilic coating (e.g., col. 5, ll. 14-42, col. 11, ll. 16-45 and FIG. 5, and col. 17, Example 5).                 
               The grafting component includes various oligomers and polymers, is multifunctional and can                            
               interact with UV photoinitiators to polymerize and crosslink (e.g., col. 6, ll. 54-64, col. 19, l. 56,                
               to col. 11, l. 15, col. 11, ll. 16-45 and FIG. 5, and col. 17, Example 5; see answer, page 4).  The                   
               lubricious, hydrophilic polymer can be selected from a variety of polymers (e.g., col. 7, ll. 45-53,                  

                                                                                                                                    
               1  See generally, The American Heritage Dictionary Of The English Language 1038 (4th ed.,                             
               Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company. 2000).                                                                              

                                                                - 4 -                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007