Ex Parte Clauss et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is                   
               not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                 

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                           __________                                                              
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                           __________                                                              
                                                 Ex parte JAMES M. CLAUSS,                                                         
                                                     KEVIN M. LINSCOTT                                                             
                                                     AND DAVID J. FORD                                                             
                                                           __________                                                              
                                                     Appeal No. 2006-0837                                                          
                                                   Application No. 10/081,446                                                      
                                                          ___________                                                              
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                          ___________                                                              
               Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
               MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                             

                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                       This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 16-45. Claims 1-15 have                     
               been canceled.  Claims 46-47 are allowed.                                                                           


                                                            Invention                                                              
                       Appellants’ invention relates to a method, apparatus, and article of manufacture for                        
               processing and representing error messages within a computer-aided design environment.  An                          
               occurrence of a software event that results in an error or a warning is recognized.                                 
               An indication of the error/warning is stored in an error/warning storage structure.  A result is                    






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007