Ex Parte Ohnishi et al - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 2006-0885                                                                             
                 Application No. 10/168,883                                                                       

                        Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the                          
                 Examiner and the Appellants concerning the above-noted rejections, we                            
                 refer to the Answer and the Brief.                                                               
                                                    OPINION3                                                      
                        Appellants’ invention relates to a disposable garment comprising a                        
                 liquid pervious topsheet and a liquid impervious backsheet combined with                         
                 the topsheet.  The backsheet comprises melt-blown nonwoven web made                              
                 from fine fibers having an average fiber diameter of from about 3 µm to                          
                 about 10 µm.  The backsheet has a basis weight of from about 3 g/m2 to                           
                 about 60 g/m2 and an air permeability value of at least about 15                                 
                 cm3/cm2/sec.  The nonwoven web has a moisture breathability value of at                          
                 least 7,000 g/m2/24 hours.   Representative claim 1, as presented in the                         
                 Brief, is reproduced below:                                                                      
                        1. A disposable garment comprising a liquid pervious topsheet,                            
                        a liquid impervious backsheet combined with the topsheet,                                 
                        and an absorbent core disposed between the topsheet and                                   
                        the backsheet,                                                                            
                        wherein the absorbent core comprises an absorbent gelling                                 
                        material wrapped with a tissue material;                                                  
                                                                                                                 
                 3  Appellants have presented separate arguments for claims 1, 8, 14, 15, 16 and 17.  The         
                 remaining claims not argued separately will stand or fall with claim 1.                          




                                                       -3-                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007