Ex Parte Goldstein et al - Page 2



                Appeal 2006-2258                                                                             
                Application 10/170,116                                                                       

                cathode-ray tube, where the color filter is formed between the faceplate                     
                panel and the color-emitting phosphor with the use of a photosensitive                       
                blocking layer (Br. 3-4).  Claim 1 on appeal is representative of the                        
                invention and is reproduced below:                                                           
                1. A method of manufacturing a color filter on a luminescent screen                          
                assembly for a color cathode-ray tube (CRT), comprising:                                     
                      providing a faceplate panel having a patterned light absorbing matrix                  
                thereon defining a first set of fields, a second set of fields and a third set of            
                fields;                                                                                      
                      forming a photosensitive blocking layer over the second set of fields                  
                and the third set of fields;                                                                 
                applying a first color filter to the first set of fields; and                                
                      removing the photosensitive blocking layer in the second set of fields                 
                and the third set of fields.                                                                 
                      The Examiner has relied on the following references as evidence of                     
                unpatentability:                                                                             
                Haven                                      US 4,251,610 Feb. 17, 1981                        
                Koike                                      US 5,922,395 Jul. 13, 1999                        
                Yamato                                   US 6,004,724 Dec. 21, 1999                          
                      Claims 1, 2, 8, and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                      
                anticipated by Haven (Answer 2).  Claims 1, 2, 5-8, and 11-13 stand rejected                 
                under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Haven and Koike (Answer 4).                    
                Claims 4 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable                      
                over Haven in view of Yamato (Answer 7) or Haven and Koike in view of                        
                                                     2                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007