Ex Parte Wells - Page 2

            Appeal No. 2006-0948                                                    
            Application No. 10/354,756                                              

                      passing said web of insulator material                        
                 around one of said guide rollers;                                  
                      folding said outer edges of said web of                       
                 insulator material around end turns of springs of                  
                 said spring assembly; and                                          
                      securing said web of insulator material to                    
                 itself to secure said web of insulator material                    
                 to said spring assembly.                                           
                 The Examiner relies upon the following references as               
            evidence of unpatentability:                                            
            Withoff                 3,325,833          Jun. 20, 1967               
            Wooldridge et al.        3,813,843          Jun. 04, 1974               
            Mossbeck                6,175,997          Jan. 23, 2001               

                 Claims 1, 3, 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
            § 103(a) as being obvious over Mossbeck in view of Withoff.             
                 Claims 1, 2 and 4 through 13 stand rejected under                  
            35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious over Wooldridge in view             
            of Withoff.                                                             
                 We refer to the brief and reply brief and to the                   
            answer for a discussion of the respective viewpoints                    
            expressed by the appellant and by the examiner concerning               
            the above noted rejections.                                             

                                      OPINION                                       
                 For the reasons set forth below, we will not sustain               
            either of these rejections.                                             

                     Rejection over Mossbeck in view of Withoff                     
                 Claims 1, 3, 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
            § 103(a) as being obvious over Mossbeck in view of Withoff.             
                 According to the examiner,                                         

                                         2                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007