Ex Parte Doddi et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.  


                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                          
                                     ____________                                     
                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                             
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                       ____________                                   
               Ex parte SRINIVAS DODDI, LAWRENCE LANE, VI VUONG,                      
                MIKE LAUGHERY, JUNWEI BAO, KELLY BARRY,                               
                   NICKHIL JAKATDAR and EMMANUEL DREGE                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2006-0996                                 
                              Application No. 10/162,516                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent             
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                              ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                
                                                                                     
          Appellants request that we reconsider our decision of May 15,               
          2006 wherein we sustained the rejection of claims 1, 6, 8, 9, 13,           
          27, 29, 38-41, 48, and 54 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. ' 102 and         
          the rejection of claims 10 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                    









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007