Appeal No. 2006-1090
Application No. 09/848,005
the rejection of claim 28, nor of claims 29 and 30 that incorporate the limitations of claim
28.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 20-25 and 27-30 under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 is
affirmed with respect to claims 20-25 and 27, but reversed with respect to claims 28-30.
The examiner’s decision is thus affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). See 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MAHSHID D. SAADAT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007