Ex Parte Kelly et al - Page 1



              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for          
                         publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
                                             __________                                               
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                             __________                                               
                         Ex parte WAYNE KELLY and DENNIS CHILCOTE                                     
                                             __________                                               
                                          Appeal 2006-1164                                            
                                       Application 10/139,185                                         
                                       Technology Center 1700                                         
                                            ___________                                               
                                      Decided: August 30, 2006                                        
                                            ___________                                               
            Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                            
            GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      

                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                  This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1-5, 10, 13-16, 24, 25,       
            32 and 46.                                                                                
                  We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                  
                  The subject matter on appeal relates to a method of minimizing particle             
            generation during handling of ultra pure liquids and to a system for handling ultra       
            pure liquids which reduces particle generation.  This appealed subject matter is          
            adequately illustrated by independent claims 1, 32, and 46 which read as follows:         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007