Ex Parte Wiedeman et al - Page 1





                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                                                     
                        publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                             


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                
                                                       _______________                                                                                     
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                  
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                      
                                                       _______________                                                                                     
                             Ex Parte  ROBERT A. WIEDEMAN and PRASHANT V. WAKNIS                                                                           
                                                       _______________                                                                                     
                                                     Appeal No.  2006-1221                                                                                 
                                                  Application No. 09/846,995                                                                               
                                                       _______________                                                                                     
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                                                        
                                                       _______________                                                                                     

                 Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                  
                 JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                 


                 This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection                                                      
                 of claims 1-6, 8-15, 17-24, and 26-31.  Claims 7, 16, and 25 have been cancelled.  Claims 32-                                             
                 34 have been allowed.                                                                                                                     
                 The disclosed invention pertains to a low performance warning system and method                                                           
                 for mobile satellite service user terminals.                                                                                              
                 Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                                                          
                 A mobile satellite telecommunications system, comprising:                                                                                 
                    • at least one user terminal;                                                                                                          
                    • at least one satellite in earth orbit; and                                                                                           













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007