Ex Parte Song et al - Page 7

                Appeal  2006-1306                                                                             
                Application 10/218,991                                                                        
                      The Examiner’s statement that “the xylitol of Reed et al would have                     
                inherently been melted when heated to 200°F” (Answer 5) appears to be                         
                speculative at best.  Reed does not indicate that any part of the syrup is                    
                melted or made molten by heating to “about 200°F”.  Additionally, it is                       
                unclear if the hydrogenated isomaltulose and water in the syrup mixture may                   
                affect (i.e., increase or decrease) the melting point of the xylitol.  The                    
                Examiner assumes that the components of the mixture (i.e., xylitol and                        
                hydrogenated isomaltulose) melt at their pure melting point temperatures.1                    
                It is simply not clear what effect the mixture of the compounds will have on                  
                the melting points of the pure compounds that compose the mixture, and the                    
                Examiner does not address such a matter.  The Examiner appears to be                          
                dealing in “possibilities” and “probabilities” in his determination that Reed’s               
                xylitol in the syrup melts. Robertson, 169 F.3d at 745, 49 USPQ2d at 1950-                    
                51.  As such, we find that the Examiner has failed to establish that Reed’s                   
                xylitol in the syrup mixture will melt at “100°F to about 200°F.”                             
                      Moreover, Reed does not appear to disclose the temperature range                        
                with “sufficient specificity” to anticipate Appellants’ claims.  We agree with                
                Appellants’ “sufficient specificity” analysis in their Reply Brief (Reply Br.                 
                3-4).  We add that the disclosure of a temperature range does not necessarily                 
                constitute a specific disclosure of the endpoints of that range.  Atofina v.                  
                                                                                                             
                1 Reed discloses that the “stabile solid” form of xylitol melts at “93°-                      
                94.5°C,” whereas the “metastable” form of xylitol melts at “61°-61.5°C”.                      
                (Reed, col. 4, ll. 67-68, col. 5, ll. 1).  Reed does not specify which xylitol                
                form he is using in the embodiment cited by the Examiner.  This ambiguity                     
                regarding the xylitol form further demonstrates the speculation surrounding                   
                the Examiner’s rejection over Reed.  However, regardless of the xylitol form                  
                used, Reed does not indicate that the syrup solution of xylitol, hydrogenated                 
                isomaltulose and water is melted or made molten by heating to a temperature                   
                range of “100°F to about 200°F.”                                                              
                                                      7                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007