Ex Parte Sumikawa et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-1341                                                        
          Application No. 09/782,180                                                  

          Tamaki et al. (Tamaki)          6,136,668           Oct. 24, 2000           
          Sakaguchi et al. (Sakaguchi)    6,150,194           Nov. 21, 2000           
          Takahashi et al. (Takahashi)    6,153,448           Nov. 28, 2000           
          Horiuchi et al. (Horiuchi)      6,242,799           Jun.  5, 2001           
          Ohuchi                          6,271,588           Aug.  7, 2001           
          Toyosawa                        6,337,257           Jan.  8, 2002           
               Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to a semiconductor           
          device, and method of making it, comprising a substrate having an           
          external connecting electrode on one surface and having the                 
          opposite surface abrased with a mirror finish.  The surface of              
          the substrate having a mirror finish is provided with a                     
          reinforcement member, such as a coating of resin.  According to             
          appellants “the semiconductor device has a reduced thickness so             
          that it can bend while a level of rigidity can be assured as the            
          semiconductor is reinforced with a back surface reinforcing                 
          member of resin” (page 3 of principal brief, first paragraph).              
               The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as follows:                                                                 
                    (a) claims 1 and 17 over Toyosawa,                                
                    (b) claims 2 and 4 over Toyosawa in view of Ohuchi,               
                    (c) claim 3 over Toyosawa in view of Ohuchi and                   
          Horiuchi,                                                                   
                    (d) claims 5-8 and 18 over Tamaki,                                
                    (e) claims 9-12 over Tamaki in view of Sakaguchi, and             

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007