Ex Parte Bredow et al - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2006-1346                                                                 Παγε 7                                       
              Application No. 09/845,542                                                                                                        


                     We agree with the examiner that paragraph 0067 of Sherr discloses detecting a                                              
              screen location from screen coordinates of a computer mouse in that Sherr discloses                                               
              [0067]  that a cursor is placed on a image and a mouse is clicked to activate the image.                                          
                     We will therefore, sustain the examiner's rejection of claim 10.                                                           
                     In regard to claims 11 to 14, appellants repeat the arguments made for claims 1                                            
              and 7 to 9.  We will therefore, sustain the examiner's rejection of these claims for the                                          
              reasons given above in regard to the examiner's rejection of claim 1 and  7 to 9.                                                 
                     In regard to claim 15, which recites that the shopping summary is retired upon                                             
              detection of a right click if the shopping summary is shown and turned on upon                                                    
              detection of a right click if the shopping summary is not shown, the examiner takes                                               
              Official Notice that turning programs on and off utilizing a single on/off switch activation                                      
              mechanism such as a mouse click is old and well known in the art and such would have                                              
              been obvious to show information that was currently needed and not show information                                               
              that was not currently needed.                                                                                                    
                     The appellants argue that there is no motivation to modify the Sherr system so as                                          
              to include the subject matter of claim 15.                                                                                        
                     We do not agree.  Sherr discloses that information can be displayed upon the                                               
              detection of a right click as we discussed above.  Sherr also discloses that the                                                  
              information displayed may be additional information for example, about the content to                                             
              be purchased [0011], or links to websites to purchase a physical copy of the content                                              

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007