The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LEO MATHEW, BICH-YEN NGUYEN, MICHAEL SADD,
and BRUCE E. WHITE
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1350
Application No. 10/074,732
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7-12, 14-21, 23-25, and 34.
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007