Ex Parte Mita et al - Page 4


               Appeal No. 2006-1352                                                                                                  
               Application 10/250,683                                                                                                

               component” is in operation.  Therefore, a heat dissipating member would be encompassed by the                         
               claims if it exhibits the specified properties in the presence of any “electronic component” which                    
               in operation provides “a temperature higher than room temperature” at which point the heat                            
               dissipating member would exhibit the specific characteristics.3                                                       
                       The language of claim 1 further specifies that the heat dissipating member is “formed”                        
               from a composition comprising at least any amount of any manner of silicone resin and any                             
               amount of any manner of heat conductive filler, “wherein the heat conductive filler is a mixture                      
               of a filler having an average particle size of 0.1 to 5 µm and a filler having an average particle                    
               size of 5 to 25 µm,” to the extent that the composition provides the member with the properties                       
               specified in the claim as we found above.  We find no basis in the language of claim 1 or in the                      
               written description in the specification (see, e.g., page 4, l. 36, to page 5, l. 9) on which to read                 
               any other limitation(s) on the composition and thus, the heat dissipating member, into the claim.                     
               Indeed, the specification discloses that the composition can contain, for example, silicone resins                    
               that are curable by any manner of reaction, heat conductive filler that can be surface treated,                       
               other silicone materials, such as silicone oils and gums, and other additive, such as silicone                        
               resins imparting flexibility and tack to attach the heat dissipating member to the components,                        
               and catalysts which facilitate the curing reactions, such as platinum catalysts (e.g., pages 6-8 and                  
               9-10).  The claim is open to compositions containing such additional ingredients by the use of                        
               the open-ended term “comprising.”  See generally, Exxon Chem. Pats., Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp.,                          
               64 F.3d 1553, 1555, 35 USPQ2d 1801, 1802 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (“The claimed composition is                                
               defined as comprising - meaning containing at least - five specific ingredients.”); In re Baxter,                     
               656 F.2d 679, 686-87, 210 USPQ 795, 802-03 (CCPA 1981) (“As long as one of the monomers                               
               in the reaction is propylene, any other monomer may be present, because the term ‘comprises’                          
               permits the inclusion of other steps, elements, or materials.”).  The limitation on the average                       
               particle size distribution of the heat conductive fillers is satisfied by a single filler, having one or              
               several shapes and/or otherwise provides a bimodal distribution of particles sizes falling within                     

                                                                                                                                    
               3  To the extent that the cited claim language is intended by appellants as a “method or process of                   
               use” limitation, such a limitation has no place in a product claim.  See In re Wiggins, 397 F.2d                      
               356, 359 n.4, 158 USPQ 199, 201-02 n.4 (CCPA 1968).                                                                   

                                                                - 4 -                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007