The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES D. PYLANT and SCOTT C. BRADLEY
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1377
Application No. 10/621,031
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: August 23, 2006
____________
Before OWENS, BAHR and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 15-22.
Claims 15, 19 and 22 were amended subsequent to the final rejection (mailed May
26, 2005), in an amendment filed June 10, 2005, thereby overcoming the rejection
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007