Ex Parte May et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                    publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                    
                                    ____________                                   
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                        
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                
                                    ____________                                   
                   Ex parte RAYMOND JEFFREY MAY, JAMES MARCUS CARR,                
                    MICHEAL SCOTT BRUNNER, LAVADA CAMPBELL BOGGS,                  
                       HANNONG RHIM, JAMES RUSSELL FITTS, JR.,                     
                    KENNETH MICHAEL SALTER, VICTOR CHARLES LANG,                   
                   ADRIAN ROY EGGEN and OOMMAN PAINUMOOTTIL THOMAS                 
                                    ____________                                   
                                Appeal No. 2006-1394                               
                             Application No. 09/855,188                            
                                    ____________                                   
                                      ON BRIEF                                     
                                    ____________                                   
         Before WARREN, WALTZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent          
         Judges.                                                                   
         WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
              This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims
         1 through 17, 19 through 21, and 50 through 59, which are the only claims pending in this
         application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.           






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007