Ex Parte Lochkovic et al - Page 2


           Appeal No.  2006-1403                                                                     
           Application No. 10/011,665                                                                
           Further details regarding this subject matter are set forth                               
           in representative independent claim 20 which reads as follows:                            
                       20. An optical fiber ribbon separation tool for                               
                 inhibiting attenuation during separation of an optical                              
                 fiber ribbon into more than one subset of optical                                   
                 fibers without severing an optical fiber, said optical                              
                 fiber ribbon separation tool comprising:                                            
                       an optical fiber ribbon receiving portion;                                    
                       a shearing device, the shearing device having at                              
                 least one movable blade, the movable blade being                                    
                 operable to separate said optical fiber ribbon into                                 
                 more than one subset of optical fibers, wherein, the                                
                 optical fiber separation tool leaves a matrix material                              
                 of the more than one subset substantially intact; and                               
                       a heat source being operable to transfer heat to                              
                 said optical fiber ribbon receiving portion, thereby                                
                 increasing the temperature of the optical fiber ribbon                              
                 receiving portion.                                                                  
                 The references set forth below are relied upon by the                               
           Examiner as evidence of obviousness:                                                      
           Lochkovic et al. (Lochkovic)   6,053,085      April 25, 2000                              
           Teed            3,796,118  March 12, 1974                                                 
                 The reference set forth below is relied upon by the                                 
           Appellants in their brief as evidence of non-obviousness:                                 
           Perrino et al. (Perrino)    4,850,108  July 25, 1989                                      








                                                  2                                                  


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007