Appeal No. 2006-1492
Application No. 09/884,489
In Janis, a user specifies that only selected activities
which occur within a certain date-time frame shall be recorded.
We agree with appellants’ argument, at page 4 of the reply brief,
that Janis does not describe that a document history log is
associated with an identified user, so there is no “selected user
identification,” as claimed. Moreover, since there is no
selected user identification in Janis, Janis cannot disclose
disabling history recording processes associated with the browser
for an identified session, wherein the identified session is
identified based on the selected user identification, as in
claims 1, 24, and 43.
However, in our view, Janis is not necessary for a proper
rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The examiner and appellants appear to be reading “an
identified session” in claim 1, for example, as denoting that
there is a plurality of sessions to choose from and the history
recording processes associated with that one identified session
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007