The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARTIN B. WOLK,
JAMES G. BENTSEN,
RALPH R. ROBERTS,
JOHN S. STARAL AND
YINGBO LIN
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1510
Application No. 10/414,066
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WARREN, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
Upon a careful review of the record in this appeal, we determine that this
application is not in condition for a decision at this time. Accordingly, pursuant to our
authority under 37 CFR § 41.50(a)(1)(effective Sept. 13, 2004; 69 Fed. Reg. 49960
(Aug. 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (Sept. 7, 2004)), we remand this
application to the jurisdiction of the examiner for action consistent with our remarks
below.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007