The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RANDALL C. ARNOLD
and SCOTT D. AUGUSTINE
____________
Appeal 2006-1521
Application 09/815,877
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: October 16, 2006
____________
Before GARRIS, KRATZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 34, 35, 54 and 56.1 We have jurisdiction
over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
We REVERSE and REMAND.
1 Claims 36, 37, 40, 44-47, 57-59, 61, 65-68, and 70 are also pending and are
objected to by the Examiner.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007