Appeal No. 2006-1534
Application No. 09/829,007
We also make the following art of record, although it is not applied within the
opinion.
Soll et al. (Soll) US2003/0055679 A1 March 20, 2003
(filed April 9, 1999)
Kahn et al. (Kahn) 4,866,635 September 12, 1989
Buffington et al. (Buffington) 6,159,015 December 12, 2000
(filed June 8, 1998)
Presnell et al. (Presnell) 6,182,067 January 30, 2001
(filed May 29, 1998)
Durand et al. (Durand) 6,272,467 August 7, 2001
(filed January 16, 1997)
Olsen et al. (Olsen) 7,048,544 May 23, 2006
(eff. filing November 25, 1998)
Detmer and Shortliffe, (Detmer) Using the Internet to Improve Knowledge Diffusion in
Medicine, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 8, p. 101-108, August 1997
REJECTIONS
Claims 1, 4-8, 10, 12-15, 16-18, and 20-28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(e) as being unpatentable as anticipated by Finkelstein.
Claims 9 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable as
obvious over Finkelstein.
Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable as
obvious over Finkelstein in view of Brown ‘163.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007