Appeal No. 2006-1557 Παγε 10
Application No. 10/220,514
Consequently appellants’ arguments predicated on an
interpretation of the “means for dividing” limitation of claim 20
as differentiating over the cutter (4) of Elger based on the
location for the cutter required by that claim limitation are
misplaced.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007