Ex Parte Schwemler et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                         

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                   
                                            ___________                                               
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                      
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                            ___________                                               
                                 Ex parte CHRISTOPH SCHWEMLER,                                        
                                  THOMAS ELSNER, JURGEN HEUSER                                        
                                       and CHRISTIAN KORDS                                            
                                           ____________                                               
                                       Appeal No. 2006-1586                                           
                                   Application No. 09/933,360                                         
                                           _____________                                              
                                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                           _____________                                              

            Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent                                
            Judges.                                                                                   
            KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2,                           
            4 and 5.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                        
                 1.  A process for making a shaped product from                                       
            thermoplastic polycarbonate comprising producing polycarbonate                            
            melt by a method selected from the group consisting of phase                              
            interface and melt transesterification and introducing the melt                           
            directly into a forming apparatus selected from the group                                 
            consisting of an injection molding machine and an extruder, to                            
            form said shaped product, said process characterized in the                               
            absence therefrom of polycarbonate in granular form.                                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007