The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PATRICK C. URSCHEL, MIKE JACKO, PAUL E. ARRASMITH
and BRENT BUCKS
__________
Appeal No. 2006-1588
Application No. 10/707,526
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before FRANKFORT, OWENS and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from a rejection of claims 1, 6-9, 14, 18 and
19. Claims 2-5, 10-13, 15-17 and 20, which are all of the other
pending claims, stand withdrawn from consideration by the
examiner as claiming a nonelected invention.
THE INVENTION
The appellants claim a method for cutting a food product
wherein the food product free falls through a cutting device.
Claims 1 and 14 are illustrative:
1. A method of cutting food product, the method comprising
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007