Appeal No. 2006-1604 Page 4
Application No. 09/903,201
2. Claims 7-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Lin in view of Farago, and further in view
of Wett.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the examiner, we
make reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the
rejections advanced by the examiner and the evidence of obviousness relied
upon by the examiner as support for the rejections. We have, likewise,
reviewed and taken into consideration, in reaching our decision, the
Appellants’ arguments set forth in the briefs along with the examiner’s
rationale in support of the rejections and arguments in rebuttal set forth in
the examiner’s answer.
It is our view, after consideration of the record before us, that the
evidence relied upon by the examiner does not support the examiner’s
rejections of claims 1-15. Accordingly, we reverse.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007