Appeal No. 2006-1658
Application No. 09/801,617
CONCLUSION
In view of the foregoing discussion, we have sustained the Examiner’s decision
rejecting claims 1 through 13, 15 and 17 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102. We have
also sustained the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 14 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Therefore, we affirm.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEAN R. HOMERE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JRH/kis
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007