Ex Parte Raviv et al - Page 7



         Appeal No. 2006-1688                                                       
         Application 09/901,244                                                     

                             over Kerouac in view of Baum                           
              Kerouac discloses “a hand held test probe for use with ear test       
         equipment” (col. 1, lines 5-6).                                            
              The examiner argues that “it would have been obvious to one           
         having ordinary skill in the art at the time Applicant’s invention         
         was made to provide the outer surface of an ear probe tip similar to       
         that of Kerouac with a plurality of annular flanges in view of the         
         teachings of Baum in order to automatically provide an acoustic seal       
         with the outer ear cavity that prevents propagation of sound through       
         the space of the ear cavity surrounding the exterior of the ear            
         probe tip [Baum, col. 4, lines 10-17], where the probe tip of              
         Kerouac would remain disposed proximate the second opening of the          
         ear insert of Kerouac as illustrated in Figures 2 and 8 of Kerouac”        
         (answer, page 12).1  The appellants argue that “if the ear insert of       
         Baum were used with the ear probe of Kerouac, the probe tip of             
                                                                                   
              1 The resilient cuff (12) used by Kerouac provides an air-            
         tight or hermetic seal with the canal (9) walls (col. 2,                   
         lines 19-22).                                                              





                                          7                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007