Ex Parte Kraffert - Page 1




                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication                          
                                             and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                 


                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                            
                                                            ____________                                                                
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                            ____________                                                                
                                                  Ex parte MARK J. KRAFFERT                                                             
                                                            ____________                                                                
                                                       Appeal No.   2006-1778                                                           
                                                     Application No. 09/776,364                                                         
                                                            ____________                                                                
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                   
                                                            ____________                                                                
                    Before THOMAS, KRASS, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
                    THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                



                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                            Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims                           
                    1 through 14, 17 through 21 and 23 through 32.                                                                      
                            Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                     
                            1. A method of performing a test, comprising:                                                               
                            performing a first test with a first test system;                                                           
                            performing a second test with a second test system:                                                         
                            in each of the first and second test systems, receiving plural parameters;                                  








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007