Ex Parte Mayers et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered                               
                 today was not written for publication in a law journal                             
                 and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                  
                                        ________________                                            
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                    
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                           
                                        ________________                                            
                             Ex parte MATEO JOZEF JACQUES MAYERS                                    
                                                and                                                 
                                  RENE LODEWIJK MARIE DEMMER                                        
                                        ________________                                            
                                      Appeal No. 2006-1864                                          
                                  Application No. 10/167,922                                        
                                        ________________                                            
                                             ON BRIEF                                               
                                        ________________                                            
           Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent                                
           Judges.                                                                                  
           KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                     

                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                           
                 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-4,                          
           6, 7, and 11.  Claim 12 has been allowed by the examiner, and                            
           claims 8, 9, and 13 are objected to.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                           
           1. A process of making a high purity brine from a salt source                            
           contaminated with sulfate ions and alkaline (earth) metal ions                           
           other than sodium, wherein said process comprises dissolving                             
           said salt source in water in the presence of at least a low                              
           molecular weight retarding agent having a molecular weight of                            
           less than 1,000 Dalton and a high molecular weight retarding                             
                                                -1-                                                 



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007