Ex Parte Yagi et al - Page 1




                                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                 
                                  written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                           __________                                                               
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                           __________                                                               
                      Ex parte NOBUYOSHI YAGI, MINORU MIYATAKE, TOSHIYUKI UMEHARA,                                                  
                                     YOSHIMASA SAKATA, and KIICHI SHIMODAIRA                                                        
                                                           __________                                                               
                                                     Appeal No. 2006-1872                                                           
                                                  Application No. 09/769,376                                                        
                                                          ___________                                                               
                                                    HEARD: JULY 12, 2006                                                            
                                                          ___________                                                               
               Before GARRIS, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   




                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              
                       This appeal involves claims 1, and 3-6, the only claims pending in this application.  We                     
               have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                       















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007