Ex Parte Takano et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not          
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                                                       
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                         
                                      __________                                        
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                        
                       Ex parte TADASHI TAKANO and SUSUMU ANDO                          
                                      __________                                        
                                 Appeal No. 2006-1880                                   
                              Application No. 10/064,363                                
                                      ___________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                         
                                      ___________                                       
          Before HAIRSTON, LEVY, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                       
          MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                    
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                 
          claims 1, 4, and 6. Claims 2, 3, and 5 have been canceled.1                   






                                                                                       
          1 Contrary to Appellants’ brief at page 1, claim 5 is not on                  
          appeal before this Board.                                                     




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007