Ex Parte Wulforst et al - Page 1



             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                              
                     for publication and isnot binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                        ____________                                                            
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                         ____________                                                           
               Ex parte CHRISTOPHER CARL WULFORST, KYLE GARROD GIPSON, and                                      
                                     DUFF BERNARD WAGNER                                                        
                                         ____________                                                           
                                    Appeal No. 2006-1922                                                        
                                 Application No. 10/207,519                                                     
                                   Technology Center 3643                                                       
                                         ____________                                                           
                                           ON BRIEF                                                             
                                         ____________                                                           
           Before FRANKFORT, BAHR, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
           LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
                This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                          
           rejection of claims 1, 2, 15, 17-20 and 23-25.  Claims 3-14, 16,                                     
           21, 22 and 26-46 have been withdrawn from consideration due to a                                     
           restriction requirement (brief, page 2).                                                             

           We AFFIRM.                                                                                           
















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007