Ex Parte Spencer et al - Page 1


                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                 
                     written for                         publication and is not binding precedent of the                
                     Board.                                                                                             


                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                  _______________                                                       
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                  _______________                                                       
                Ex Parte  ANDREW M. SPENCER, TODD C. ADELMANN, and MARGO N. WHALE                                       
                                                Appeal No. 2006-2011                                                    
                                             Application No. 09/996,720                                                 
                                                  _______________                                                       
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                  _______________                                                       

              Before THOMAS, KRASS, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
              JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 

              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                        
                                                                                                                       
              This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                                
              rejection of claims 1-6, 8, 9, 12-14, 16-18, 20-27, and 30-33, which constitute all the                   
              claims pending in this application.                                                                       
              The disclosed invention pertains to a method and apparatus for storing memory                             
              card usage information on a memory card.                                                                  
              Representative claims 1 and 14 are reproduced as follows:                                                 
                     1 A method for storing memory card usage information on a memory card                              
                     comprising:                                                                                        
                            collecting information about usage of the memory card using a processor;                    







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007