Ex Parte Nguyen et al - Page 4


                Appeal No. 2006-2023                                                                                                                  Page 4
                Application No. 10/650,785                                                                                                
                        disclosure of the ‘044 application, the ‘785 application is a continuation-in-part of                             
                        the ‘044 application (Office action, p. 2 (mailed 24 August 2004)).                                               
                    10. The examiner determined that claims 1-26 of the ‘785 application had an                                           
                        effective filing date of 29 August 2003 (Office action, p. 3 (mailed 24 August                                    
                        2004)).                                                                                                           
                    11. Patent application publication No. 2002/0121479 (“Mueller”) was published on 5                                    
                        September 2002.                                                                                                   
                    12. Therefore, according to the examiner, Mueller qualifies as prior art under 35                                     
                        U.S.C. § 102(a) (Office action, p. 3 (mailed 24 August 2004)).                                                    
                    13. The examiner rejected claims 1-26 as being clearly anticipated by Mueller (Office                                 
                        action, p. 3 (mailed 24 August 2004)).                                                                            
                    14.  Appellants did not contest the examiner’s contention that claims 1-26 are clearly                                
                        anticipated by Mueller, but rather argued that Mueller is not available as prior art                              
                        (Response to Office action, p. 7 (filed 21 January 2005)).                                                        
                    15. The ‘044 specification describes filtering water through “a membrane                                              
                        system” (p. 2, lines 8-9), a “continuous fully suspended system,” wherein                                         
                        the resin may conveniently be separated from the treated water by gravity                                         
                        settling (p. 3, lines 30-31), and a “recycle system,” wherein settled resin is                                    
                        mixed in hoppers to keep it in a fluid condition and to ensure uniform                                            
                        concentration (p. 4, lines 10-12).                                                                                
                    16. Specifically, the ‘044 application describes a process for removal of                                             
                        dissolved organic carbon from water including the steps of: (a) adding an                                         
                        ion-exchange resin to water containing dissolved organic carbon; (b)                                              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007