Appeal No. 2006-2063
Application No. 10/126,019
Claims 8 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Randklev in view of Brennan and Bullock.
Claims 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Randklev in view of Litke.
Claim 22 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Randklev in view of Burnell-Jones.
Claim 23 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Randklev in view of Bullock and Litke.
Claims 28, 30 and 32 through 36 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Randklev in view of
Sondhi.
Claim 29 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Randklev in view of Sondhi and Brennan.
Claims 37 through 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Randklev in view of Sondhi and
Kaelble.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007