Ex Parte VandenBerg - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2006-2067                                                                                                 
               Application 10/437,836                                                                                               

                               analyzing the returns to determine the elevation according to one or more of                         
                       the following modalities:                                                                                    
                               phase monopulse(PM)                                                                                  
                               amplitude monopulse(AM), and                                                                         
                               time delay response(TDR).                                                                            
                               13. A multi-mode altimeter system for use on a platform that moves relative to                       
                       a terrain of interest, the system comprising:                                                                
                               a multi-channel antenna operative to generate overlapping antenna patterns                           
                       on a terrain partitioned into a plurality of sampling lanes; and                                             
                               a processor to perform elevation measurements of the terrain, including time-                        
                       delay-response(TDR), amplitude-monopulse(AM) and phase-monopulse(PM)                                         
                       operational modes.                                                                                           

                                                        THE REFERENCES                                                              
               Madsen et al. (Madsen)          5,659,318          Aug. 19, 1997                                                     
               Marino et al. (Marino)          6,396,437          May  28, 2002                                                     


                                                         THE REJECTIONS                                                             
                       Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                                  
               Madsen in view of Marino.                                                                                            
                                                              OPINION                                                               
                       The rejection is reversed as to claims 1-12 and 17-20, and affirmed as to claims 13-                         
               16.                                                                                                                  
                                                       Claims 1-12 and 17-20                                                        
                       We need to address only the independent claims, i.e., claims 1, 6, 7 and 17.  Claims                         
               1 and 7 require a method for remotely sensing terrain elevation comprising sampling returns                          

                                                                   2                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007