Ex Parte Gusler et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2006-2090                                                                                               
               Application No. 10/004,925                                                                                         


                      Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                  
                      1.  A method of monitoring use of an instant messaging source user account, comprising:                     
                      receiving an instant message from a destination user;                                                       
                      searching a registry that identifies a set of approved destination users to determine if a                  
               transcript of the received instant message is desired, wherein the transcript is not desired if the                
               destination user is identified in the registry as being an approved destination user, and wherein                  
               the transcript is desired if the destination user is not identified in the registry as being an                    
               approved destination user;                                                                                         
                      storing the transcript of the received instant message in a storage device in response to                   
               determining that the transcript is desired;                                                                        
                      analyzing the transcript for occurrences of questionable content to thereby identify at                     
               least one portion of the transcript having questionable content; and                                               
                      providing the at least one portion of the transcript to a designated monitor of the instant                 
               messaging source user account.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                 
                      The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                               
               Donahue    2002/0004907    Jan. 10, 2002                                                                           
                                                                                     (filed Jan. 11, 2001)                        
               Fertell et al. (Fertell)   2002/0032770    Mar. 14, 2002                                                           
                                                                                     (filed May 25, 2001)                         
                      Claims 1 through 8, 10 through 18, 20 through 28 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                      
               § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Donahue.                                                                       
                      Claims 9, 19 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                      
               Donahue in view of Fertell.                                                                                        




                                                                2                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007