Ex Parte Bowden et al - Page 5



         Appeal No. 2006-2101                                                       
         Application No. 10/085,303                                                 

         want to minimize its presence not only on the electrode but also           
         in the electrode's environment.                                            
              Appellants rely upon the Declaration of Michael Pozin, one            
         of the present inventors, as evidence that a lithium cell must             
         be made according to a controlled process in order to limit its            
         sodium content within the claimed range.  The declarant states             
         that "the sodium content of the lithium electrochemical cell               
         components typically would result in a cell having a sodium                
         content of greater than 1500 ppm" unless the components are                
         specifically obtained to have a low sodium content (paragraphs 5           
         and 6 of Declaration).  However, we agree with the examiner that           
         the disclosures of Harrison and Boryta would have motivated one            
         of ordinary skill in the art to treat the components of a                  
         lithium cell in order to ensure a minimum concentration of the             
         deleterious sodium impurity.  We note that the Declaration does            
         not address the teachings of Harrison and Boryta.                          
              In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well-           
         stated by the examiner, the examiner's decision rejecting the              
         appealed claims is affirmed.                                               




                                        -5-                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007