Ex Parte Parsons - Page 2



            Appeal No. 2006-2104                                                                          
            Application No. 10/655,904                                                                    

                                              BACKGROUND                                                  
                  Appellant’s invention is directed to electromagnetic                                    
            radiation detection at wavelengths shorter than about 10                                      
            micrometers.  According to Appellant, a radiation sensor made of                              
            SiC having a thickness of at least 200 micrometers shows acoustic                             
            absorption mechanism that is useful in detecting radiation at                                 
            less than 10 micrometers (specification, page 3).                                             
                  Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
                        1.     An electromagnetic radiation detection system,                             
                  comprising:                                                                             
                        a body of SiC having a thickness of at least about 400                            
                  micrometers, and                                                                        
                        a detector arranged to detect acoustic absorption of                              
                  electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength less than                                 
                  about 10 micrometers by said SiC body.                                                  
                  The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference:                               
                  Ichikawa                 5,025,243                Jun. 18, 1991                         
                  Claims 1-5 and 7-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                             
            as being unpatentable over Ichikawa.                                                          
                  Rather than reiterate the opposing arguments, reference is                              
            made to the briefs and the answer for the respective positions of                             
            Appellant and the Examiner.  Only those arguments actually made                               
            by Appellant have been considered in this decision.  Arguments                                

                                                    2                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007