Ex Parte Arterburn - Page 4

           Appeal No. 2006-2168                                                                                                     
           Application No. 10/421,683                                                                                               


           Specification as a whole (particularly pages 15 and 16 and Figures 7 and 8)                                              
           provides ample description of these terms such that one of ordinary skill in the                                         
           bushing art would understand the scope of the claimed invention.  According to                                           
           Appellant, the term "portion" as used in the specification refers to parts of the area                                   
           of the screens, and it is clearly taught that these areas will vary with the size of the                                 
           bushing and screen, as well as the particular condition being addressed, i.e., size of                                   
           the bushings, area, number of tips, etc., will vary based on the product being                                           
           manufactured.  Appellant maintains that the Specification shows the "peripheral                                          
           portion" as a portion that surrounds the "generally central portion," the term                                           
           "generally” indicating that the central portion may be non-symmetrical on the                                            
           center of the screen.                                                                                                    
                   In Appeal No. 2006-0192, we determined that one of ordinary skill in the art                                     
           in reading Appellant’s application would have understood the term "end portions”                                         
           as defining areas of the screen proximate each end of the bushing and the term                                           
           “mid or central portion” as an area of the screen located between the “end                                               
           portions.”  Likewise, in the present application, we find that the corresponding                                         
           claim terms "generally central portion" and "peripheral portion" would appraise                                          
           one of ordinary skill in the art of the scope of the appealed claims.  We note, for                                      
           example, that the meaning of these terms is readily apparent from the description                                        
           in connection with Figure 8 of “a low flow central portion 70 that is not                                                
           symmetrically located in the center of the screen 68, but is offset” and “a medium                                       
           flow portion 72 of the screen [which] surrounds the low flow center portion                                              
           70,”Specification 16.  Moreover, we are confident that one of ordinary skill in the                                      
           art would understand that the portions are not limited to the embodiments shown in                                       
           the drawings, but may be adjusted using the guidelines set forth in the                                                  


                                                             4                                                                      


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007